Letter to Matthew Nimetz
United Nations Special Envoy on the Name Dispute
between Greece and Republic of Macedonia
May 5th, 2005
Read
this page in Greek
Florina / Lerin
Your Excellency
On 11 April 2005 the Greek newspaper Eleftherotypia (p. 7) published
the statements and proposals put forth by you in your capacity as UN
Special Mediator between Greece and the Republic of Macedonia on the
issue of the name Macedonia. The article in question reports you as
having proposed a 13-point referendum to the UN General Assembly for
resolution of the issue, together with your own interpretive statement
on these points.
In our dual capacity as citizens of Greece as well as members of the
Macedonian minority in Greece, we believe that we have a right to comment
on the content of your statement and proposals, given that we are directly
concerned with the peace of the greater region. In addition to this
significant reason, we also feel that your statements - which, as they
are presented in the press, constitute a resolution proposal - are rudely
insulting not only to our cultural, linguistic and ethnic identity but
also to our unalienable right to self-definition.
Specifically, in a section of your interpretive statement you mention
inter alia: "As yet another example, the Republika Makedonija-Skopje
must recognize that there is an administrative province in Greece with
the name "Greek Macedonia" (and not Macedonia of the Aegean
or Aegean Macedonia under Greece) and that those who live in Greek Macedonia
commonly define themselves as Greek Macedonians in the Greek regional
and cultural sense of the name, and that such names have to be used
and respected."**
With all due respect, Mr. Nimetz, we are obliged to inform
you that this province of Northern Greece, or Greek Macedonia, is also
inhabited by Greek citizens who define themselves as ethnic Macedonians.
They are the members of the indigenous ethnic Macedonian minority, who
in no way adopt the Greek regional and cultural sense of the name you
refer to.
Could you kindly inform us: on the basis of what data did you assume
that Northern Greece is inhabited solely by Greeks, so that when the
neighboring Republic of Macedonia refers to the inhabitants of this
region it should use the exclusive term "Greek Macedonians" for
everyone, including us?
Could you kindly inform us of any UN Treaty, Convention or
Directive that states that one country can or must define/distinguish
the members of a minority of another country, without taking into consideration
the minority's own choice of cultural, linguistic, national or ethnic
identity?
Over the past decades the United Nations has shown its concern for
minority rights through resolutions, declarations and missions. It is
not happenstance that when the General Assembly ratified the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, it was decided that the UN could
not remain indifferent to the fate of minorities (Decision 217 C III
of 10 December 1948). Comparable examples in recent years include the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the Declaration
on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious
and Linguistic Minorities ratified by the UN in 1992, the establishment
of the Human Rights Commission (HRC), and the Working Group on Minorities
(WGM) in 1995. We presume that you agree that all this demonstrates
the UN's ongoing concern for the rights that persons belonging to minorities
must enjoy. It is precisely for these reasons that your statement so
unpleasantly surprised us.
How, then, are we able to enjoy our rights as members of the ethnic
Macedonian minority of Greece when, in addition to suffering decades
of repression and the Greek government's refusal of recognition, we
are now at risk of being deprived of even the fundamental right of self-definition?
Because, if the resolution is adopted on the basis of your proposal,
a third party will be defining us as something else.
We fear that your reference in the interpretive statement comes into
conflict with the spirit and philosophy behind the protection of minority
rights, a sensitivity that the UN has demonstrated from its founding
to the present day.
With all due respect, Mr. Nimetz, in another point of your interpretive
statement you say: "...I believe it would be helpful if the two
governments took into special consideration the internationally recognized
conventions and practices concerning the use of toponyms in other states
and begin bilateral discussions in good faith on this issue. [Their
efforts should include] the use of a proper definition of toponyms in
their respective educational systems, official maps and calendar events,
and [an attempt] to encourage private companies, tourist agencies and
similar organizations to adopt the internationally respected toponyms
and names."**
We would like to believe that your reference to "internationally
respected toponyms and names" includes the respect that governments
must demonstrate for the use of toponyms used by minorities in their
own language. As members of the ethnic Macedonian minority in Greece
we know that international practices lean towards respecting and using
minority toponyms in the places where minorities live. We would like
to inform you that in Northern Greece there are a plethora of toponyms
and minor place-names in the Macedonian language, which are currently
unofficially used by the members of the minority in their colloquial
speech but which, unfortunately, are not officially recognized by the
Greek government. We believe that, albeit in this indirect manner, your
proposals on the aforementioned issue will finally bring about the accepted
use of dual nomenclature (both in Greek and Macedonian languages) for
toponyms in the regions of Northern Greece inhabited by the Macedonian
minority. The fact is these toponyms comprise the linguistic and cultural
wealth not only of the minority or the country, but also of the region
at large.
Point 8 of the proposal that, according to the Greek press you put
forward for a possible Security Council resolution, states that: "...Macedonia
has significance and has been linked to the heritage, culture and history
of the Hellenic Republic and the Greek people since antiquity, that
'Macedonia' is a name widely used in the region of Northern Greece,
and that the inhabitants of the province inside the Hellenic Republic
commonly call themselves Macedonians."**
Mr. Nimetz, with all due respect, could you please explain how it is
possible for one country alone, such as the Hellenic Republic, to be
linked to the culture, heritage and history of a region that throughout
time is known to have been multinational and multicultural, as is the
region of Northern Greece today?
For sake of veracity we would like to invite you and your colleagues
to make a personal visit to Northern Greece so that you can see the
living reality for yourselves.
Mr. Nimetz, we have every respect for the task you have undertaken
and wish you every success. However, please permit us to express our
views on the issue of the name. As minority Macedonians in Greece as
well as members of the Rainbow political party, which has participated
in the Greek political arena since 1994 and in the European Parliament
as a member of the European Free Alliance (5 EMPs), we believe we can
assist you in your endeavor.
The Macedonian issue, and by extension the issue of the name, is as
complex as it is simple.
Our political position on the issue of the name of the Republic of
Macedonia is based on the democratic principle that every individual
and every people has the right to choose the name by which it wishes
to define itself. We believe that this individual and collective democratic
right is a European as well as a universal value. After all, it is on
the basis of this principle that we call ourselves ethnic Macedonians
in Greece.
Concerning the name per se of the state of Republic of Macedonia, it
is already a composite since "Republic of Macedonia," which
denotes statehood, differentiates from "Macedonia." Besides
which, no province of Greece carries the name "Republic of Macedonia," to
create confusion with the use of the above term.
Concerning the term Macedonian, the majority of inhabitants of Northern
Greece commonly call themselves Greeks or "Greek Macedonians," because
they are Greek citizens and also because they have chosen to belong
to the Greek nation. The use of the term "Macedonian" by ethnic
Greeks is either a geographical or an ethnic designation with the addition
of the prefix "Greek" in front of the word "Macedonian." Only
the members of the Macedonian minority in Northern Greece use the term "Macedonian" as
an ethnic definition, as in the term "ethnic Macedonian," to
define themselves. Those in Northern Greece who have chosen to belong
to the Greek nation use the term "Greek" or "Greek Macedonian," and
those who belong to the Macedonian minority use the term "Macedonian" or "ethnic
Macedonian."
The Greek government's objections to the use of the term are on the
surface a technical problem, since the key to the so-called "Macedonian
issue" lies elsewhere. The problem in the region as far as the
Macedonian issue is concerned is, in essence, the refusal of the Balkan
countries, including Greece, to recognize the existence and to respect
the rights of the Macedonian nation. This of course also entails the
refusal to recognize the existence and the rights of the Macedonian
minority in Greece. The problem is not as the Greek government presents
it; it is not about cultural heritage, or that a portion of territorial
Greece bears the administrative name Province of Macedonia, or that
the neighboring state calls itself Republic of Macedonia. What the Greek
government stubbornly refuses to admit is that it does not agree with
the ethnic use of the terms "Macedonia," or "Macedonian" because
of the existence of the Macedonian minority in Greece, whom (according
to Greek nationalists) could potentially rise up in the future with
separatist demands. This is the real problem for the Greek government,
and not its neighboring country's name. However, if the Greek government
admits this, then it must also proceed with proper measures to recognize
and respect the rights of the minority. However, we believe that it
is precisely through this way and practice, as implemented in the democratic
countries of Europe, that peace and stability can be strengthened in
the region. The latter is certainly not achieved by suppressing the
rights of minorities such as the Macedonian minority, or by questioning
the right of a neighboring state to use the name Macedonia.
In our activities as political officials we have repeatedly proclaimed
that all Balkan borders must be respected as unalterable by the Balkan
states for the sake of the peace and prosperity of the region's inhabitants.
Likewise, in our political practice throughout the years we have endeavored
through democratic and peaceful means to pressure the Greek government
to respect our rights, as would any civilized and democratic state in
today's Europe. After all, today and in the world to come, Europe is
and will always be our common homeland.
We wish you success in your efforts.
THE POLITICAL SECRETARIAT
Anastasiadis Stavros
Mpoules Anastasios
Parisis Athanasios
Dimtsis Petros
Mantzas Elevtherios
Voskopoulos Pavlos
Kazias Petros
Kligkatsis Pantelis
** Translator's note: All statements in quotation marks, which are
attributed
to Mr. Nimetz, have been translated from a text
in Greek, published by
Eleftherotypia, April 11, 2005, page
7.
|