| 
       COMMENT BY THE MOVEMENT AGAINST NATIONALISM 
      24 February 2004 
        Read
        this page in Greek 
        
       
        Postal address: PO 13794 10310 Athens 
        E-mail: antiethnikistiki@wxs.nl  
        Website: www.sitemaker.gr/antiethnikistik  
      The Movement against Nationalism is publishing the press release by
        the Greek Association for Human Rights because we believe it has a direct
        bearing on our campaign against nationalism – despite the fact that,
        at first sight, it seems to refer only to the religious freedoms of
        those Greek citizens who are not Orthodox Christians, freedoms which
        in Greece are systematically denied. 
      The representatives of the Greek state are happy to satisfy most of
        the demands of the Greek Orthodox Church, provided that these do not
        conflict too starkly with the directives of the European Union, as in
        the case of the declaration of religious affiliation on identity cards. 
      The Greek constitution states that the Orthodox faith is the official
        religion of the Greek state. This is the result of factors directly
        associated with the national identity distinguishing the Greeks from
        other peoples. 
      This relationship between the state and the Orthodox Church, too complex
        to be discussed in detail in the confines of this introductory note,
        is manifested in the adoption of the Orthodox faith as an integral part
        of Greek national identity, to be seen first in the references to the
        ‘Orthodox banners of Revolution’ raised by the leaders of the struggle
        for independence, second in the use of the cross as the dominant symbol
        in the Greek national flag, and third in the identification of national
        and religious holidays – with the obligatory presence of the priest
        at celebrations of national holidays and the involvement of army and
        state in major religious ceremonies. 
      This intimate relationship between state and church was entered upon
        without any consideration for the ethnic origins, language, customs
        and traditions which characterized the various ethnic cultural groups
        who were living in the newly-created modern Greek state. 
      It is this national identification with the Orthodox faith which leads
        Greek nationalists to persecute Greek citizens of other faiths, while
        assisting the leadership of the Greek Orthodox Church to take an aggressive
        lead in persecuting the ethnic minorities still living in Greece. 
      Since its very inception the modern Greek state has been waging a systematic
        campaign - using all means at its disposal, licit or illicit – to impose
        one language and one religion on the Greek people. In support of this
        project it has used a partial, distorted, fanatical version of history,
        entirely unsupported by fact. 
      With regard to the decision by the Deputy Minister of Domestic Affairs,
        denounced by the Greek Committee for Human Rights, the Movement against
        Nationalism regards it as no more or less than a CONSTITUTIONAL COUP
        D’ETAT. 
      This is perhaps the first time since the fall of the junta that a representative
        of the state has – using procedures entirely lacking in transparency
        and during the run-up to a general election – taken a decision which
        overrides no fewer than three provisions of the Constitution: namely
        those guaranteeing religious freedom (Article 13), sanctity of private
        life (Article 9) and freedom of movement within the country (Article
        5). Even worse, this decision was taken without any consultation with
        the political parties or organizations representing the citizens who
        will be affected. 
      The Movement against Nationalism believes that this undemocratic and
        unashamedly nationalist (in terms of motivation) conduct must be denounced
        in all the forums of the European Union as a repellent example of institutional
        prejudice against Islam – an affront to the most fundamental principles
        of the European Union, uncomfortably reminiscent of the darkest chapters
        in our history. As such it must be brought to the attention of the appropriate
        international organizations, especially the UN Commission for Human
        Rights, the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, and
        the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance of the Council
        of Europe. 
      It is quite simply outrageous that the state should forbid Greek citizens
        of Muslim faith to marry foreign citizens in accordance with their own
        religious rites and in the presence of the Mufti of Thrace. 
      It is patently clear that this decision, which is also in contravention
        of the European Convention on Human Rights, represents an attempt to
        remove the right to free choice of a foreign spouse. It will automatically
        turn Muslims in Greece into second-class citizens, subject to an intolerable
        burden of oppression extending even into their personal lives. 
      The ministerial decision represents an unacceptable form of pressure
        exerted on Greek Muslims, preventing them from selecting foreign spouses
        in an attempt to limit the ‘Muslim element’ living perfectly legally
        in Greece. 
      This act is a triumph for the nationalists, who seek to create a homogenous
        society, given that most Greek Muslims are of Turkish descent, a fact
        hard to stomach for the advocates of the horrific theory: ‘one nation
        – one race – one faith’. 
      The arbitrary imposition of the marriage rite only in Thrace and only
        for the residents of Thrace is a crude attempt to concentrate the Muslim
        population in just ONE region, a practice reminiscent of the confining
        of populations to ghettoes on the basis of their ethnic and religious
        identity during periods of history which the continent of Europe will
        never forget. 
      This is an issue of major importance and the Movement against Nationalism
        is now sounding the alarm, calling on all those who believe in the ideals
        of freedom and human rights to raise their voices in protest against
        such despicable actions – actions which sadly represent the implementation
        in practice of a fanatical nationalism so destructive and, hitherto,
        so prevalent in Greece. 
       
      GREEK ASSOCIATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS 
             
        PRESS RELEASE 
   
        Religious marriages forbidden to Muslims of Thrace! 
   
        Athens, 24 February 2004 
       
        By decision of the Deputy Minister Mr. Lambros Papadimas (F. 97920/201138
        / 31.10.2003) the celebration of weddings in the presence of the Mufti
        of Thrace is deemed to be illegal in the case of the following: 
      1. A Muslim and non-Muslim 
      2. A Greek citizen and foreigner 
      3. Muslims not resident in Thrace 
      In effect this ruling makes it impossible for Muslims living outside
        Thrace (or Rhodes) to marry in accordance with the Islamic rites, since
        there are no serving Muftis in other parts of Greece. The consequence
        is that a significant percentage of the minority population originating
        in Thrace but no longer resident there, as well as other Greek Muslims
        (most of them naturalized citizens) will not be able to wed according
        to the Islamic rites in Greece. At the same time the confusion concerning
        the rules governing the marriages of foreign Muslims is rendered even
        more obscure. This prohibition will thus affect tens of thousands of
        individuals. 
      The Greek Association for Human Rights calls on the government to revoke
        its earlier decision, which introduces unconstitutional curbs on religious
        freedom in respect of the right to choose a spouse, as well as on the
        free movement of individuals, given that under the new dispensation
        a move outside Thrace will entail the loss of the right to celebrate
        an Islamic wedding. The decision in question is an unprecedented encroachment
        on the private life and religious freedom of every Muslim. What is more
        it will lead to major social tensions in an area of exceptional sensitivity,
        an area which more than any other requires responsible management by
        the Greek state. 
      Finally, the Association believes that the imposition of limitations
        (regarding nationality, place of residence or religion) only on weddings
        between Muslims, when no such limitations are envisaged in the Civil
        Code for marriages between Orthodox or Catholic Christians, Jews, Jehovah’s
        Witnesses or adherents of other religions or dogmas, is a very poor
        reflection on the nature of our democracy. 
      President 
      Dimitris Christopoulos  
      General Secretary 
        Yiannis Ktistakis 
       
        
       |